Monday, June 30, 2008

political scam?

my god...news that i read nowadays...

political scam or material facts?

what i can say is whatever the accusation is, let the police dwell with this matter and move on with life as it is....whether did Anwar sodomise the kid, police investigation must be showed and proven in the court of law.

But let just ponder upon this question...if you are to run a political campaign...would you even take the risk of hiring a 'background questionable' person as a staff? i mean...damn...if I'm choosing a political aid...i will find a person which i trust and recommended by people...simple thing Anwar also cant sort out, is it that his leadership quality and his 'view' of people questionable or the person in question, mr saiful, questionable?
I think its both questionable at this instant as to my view.

I mean, if truly that mr saiful was questionable, why took him at the 1st place? Anwar must had saw something special in him to take him although his background was 'questionable'. What is the thing that made Mr Anwar to accept Mr Saiful in the 1st place, that is open for all of u to assume.

The sodomy case...i just think its one time too many...in my personal view, its either a political scam, or really an allegation of Anwar sodomising Mr Saiful has a honest proportion to it. Right now, its best leave it to the police to handle it. It is too early to acquit him of this charge and too early to convict him of anything.

Friday, June 27, 2008

Defending...

In regard to 'A Patriot' from Kuala Lumpur post in 'The Star' Friday 27 June 2008, i would agree with him on the issue he raise...

What had the opposition do till today to uphold it's election promises? Is the PR house is even i order?

The PR house is definitely not in order...there are a lot of things that doesn't in my mind can come in terms...PAS just said that they would keep aside the islamic push for the sake of the coalition. But whatever they are doing in Kelantan tells a different story. HIGH HEELS and LIPSTICK can't or better said, not advice on woman!!!!wat absurdity!!!! is this idea generally accepted by PKR and DAP? People who voted for DAP or PKR, definitely doesn't intend the incorporation of this idea of PAS too went they vote for DAP and PKR. Clearly now, when people voted for PR, they too had voted for PAS ideology. But i bet, not all intended to vote for this idea although they voted for PR. Isn't it a sort of 'scam' as like a Standard Form Contract that u'll get when you buy a ticket and those small writting beneath it saying 'they wouldn't be liable for any damages'? To put into context, it's like saying, vote for opposition, den the small writing beneath it saying 'wont guarantee there is no PAS ideology incorporated in the state'. Think About It.

They say they will lower down price hike and all...had they? If they really care for the people, i think all state government that the opposition is controlling should give oil subsidy out of their own pocket instead. Wouldn't it be fair? As clearly, they are true to their promises if it was done, but as it is now...all they do is to criticised the government heap all the blame on the government of the day instead of thinking of better way to address this issue when they as state government can do also, and work hand in hand with the federal government to address this issue. INSTEAD...they choose to point fingers and open their mouth and criticised.

As 'A Patriot' had said, the price structure on fuel is beyond Pak Lah's control because it's WORLD oil price, not MALAYSIA oil price. On this price issue, hope you would refer back to my posting last month on '...a fact that malaysian failed to see...'
the pakatan rakyat leaders have all attacked him but do they have the answers to the price hike, besides holding demonstrations and open criticism? Is this the kind of people you want to depend on to resolve the problems that seems only know how to comment and criticised?
Reforms in Malaysia had been done by Pak Lah that passes our eyes just like that, Pak Lah had took serious account on food production last time but people tend to undermine it because it had been going on for 22 years. Thus, had been proven right due to the increase petrol price hike and the food production industry given serious protection.
This was in the argument of 'A patriot'...
Furthermore, Anwar able to lower price of oil? i doubt it...even if he can, he can by lowering the oil price for few months and then raise it back again. Purpose? just to fulfill his political agenda to the people and then back to square 1 as soon as soon as he and his government cant take the burden of oil price anymore...and by then, he is already in power of our government, it wouldn't make any difference is it? that is his goal, to gain control of this country.

Anwar is clearly making a popular political move by saying that he will be lowering oil price. However, Pak Lah is making a very unpopular move by raising oil price. But this is a called for decision by our executives. Nation doesn't improve and survive through popular decision, instead survive base on bold and decisive (popular or unpopular) action. Pak Lah is in power in a bad time. He's being blame for things that happen during Dr M's time(judiciary crisis), which is unfortunate.

We need to look at things from an intellectual point of view and not of emotion and selfishness.s

A regrettable issue...bunch of OPPORTUNIST!!!

Reading Sabah's political news recently had eke to a point that I as a Sabahan felt deeply ashame of the way politics is done in Sabah...

To tell be honest, i'm at agreement with Datuk Yong Teck Lee's concern for Sabahan regarding issue of immigrants and all. However, I'm deeply ashame by the way he conducted himself in a manner that i feel is uncalled for and unethical, even in a political world that ethics is the last of everyone's concern.

I would pose this question, why would you only now, SAPP, question and have no confidence in our PM, Pak Lah, only now?

Let me explain to you my question...
March 8th, SAPP could had joint the opposition party or be independent if they have no confidence in our present PM.
Clearly, the issue that they are not happy about and therefore stating that they have no confidence in our PM is not a sudden spree of event, it had been going on for a considerable time now. I as a Sabahan know that the problem that they want to be address had been ever present. Substantial steps had been taken by our federal government, but just not sufficient. Which is why, better steps need to be taken. To think of better steps doesnt come in a months time. ROME WAS NOT BUILD IN A DAY. Time is a luxury we must give to the state and federal government.

But why now only do they have no confidence? The last time i check, Anwar wasnt even interested in addressing much of Sabah and Sarawak problems. He was busy with his bickering and stabbing of any controversial issue arise. I would call him an OPPORTUNIST. SAPP could had contended as an individual party or could had joint the opposition party. But why they didn't do it then?
And mind you...all this are just assuming and not allegation. Just my analysis and not accusing anyone but few potential scenario.
Either they weren't sure of the position they would be and whether or not the opposition would in a strong position as they are now, therefore, seat and wait for the outcome which to me amount to treachery and opportunist; or
They weren't interested at all to joint the opposition until the opposition suddenly have an interest (as result of the election) and maybe somewhere along the line offered them something. Few Sabah MP's had complaint that PKR people had been offering them money to 'differ' party. If this allegation weren't true, why dont PKR come out head held high and lodge a Police complaint for defamation? This is also treachery in SAPP part if it is true.

The opposition had clearly know and ALL OF US know for a fact that the government of the day is in power thanks to the seats won in Sabah and Sarawak. Is it not clear that the opposition (government in waiting) just need a boost in Sabah and Sarawak's MP to make them defect? Why does the opposition suddenly take so much interest of Sabah Sarawak? I mean, it doesnt take a genius to figure out that the opposition, being the opportunist they might be, is making use of all issues and controversy that can be used to topple the people's confidence in the government of the day?

SAPP had raise all the issue which need to be address, but their conduct is really uncalled for. They say that they meet with Anwar in HK, therefore after that made a decision to pass a motion of no-confidence.
WOULD SAPP PASS A MOTION OF NO CONFIDENCE VOTE IN PARLIAMENT ON THE PM IF THEY DIDN'T MEET ANWAR?

DO YOU SERIOUSLY THINK THAT SAPP WOULD HAD VOICE OUT IF NOT FOR ANWAR'S INDUCEMENT?
This is induce by Anwar, a game that he plays, a clear intention to gain power by making people switch allegiances and disrupt the house of the government of the day political party. A VERY VERY SAD AND UNETHICAL WAY!!!
Now SAPP know that they are in a tight rope, cries for other Sabah Sarawak MP to join there independent party lead by Datuk Anifah Aman. I feel that is more of a desperate call rather than of confidence. Yong Teck Lee had not done this once only but a few occasion as to switch allegiance...im not too sure bout this but think he had written a letter of apology to the public last time for his mistake. I would not trust my right on him anytime anywhere. Why do you think he didn't stand for election instead on 8th of March?

People, ITS TIME TO THINK!!!!

a regretable issue...

Reading bout Sabah politics had made me eke at the the very mention of it...

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

violet hill/dancing politician-coldplay

  © Blogger template 'A Click Apart' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP